This page uses the theorems of ordinal induction
and recursion together with several previously-given basic
results on ordinals to develop ordinal arithmetic. There are some proofs here and many exercises.
In all cases, a proposition, exercise or theorem may assume the results previously given.
Propositions given without proofs are exercises. Sometimes only a hint is
given as a proof
and completing the proof is also intended
as an exercise. There are a couple of mildly tricky points
to be found in the details of setting up ordinal arithmetic
and I have not attempted to skate over these rapidly. However,
with these details apart, the theory of ordinal arithmetic
is a very beautiful and straightforward one, enjoyable and worth learning.
Throughout, range over ordinals and range over limit ordinals.
We start by recalling a few earlier definitions and results.
Definition.
An ordinal is (possibly empty) set such that:
Definition.
iff .
Definition.
is the set .
Proposition.
For all ordinals , each element of is an ordinal.
Proposition.
For all , is an ordinal and .
Proposition.
For any set of ordinals, is an ordinal.
Definition.
A limit ordinal is an ordinal such that is nonempty and implies .
Proposition.
Every ordinal is exactly one of: zero; a limit ordinal; or for some .
Proposition.
(i.e. or ) iff .
Proof.
Hint: ordinals are transitive sets.
Proposition.
For any two ordinals either or .
Proposition.
If and then .
Proposition.
If then .
Proposition.
iff .
Proposition.
If holds for some ordinal , where is a first-order statement possibly involving other set parameters, then there is a least ordinal such that .
Proof.
Hint: look at the least such that and use results on above.
Proposition.
The class On of all ordinals is not a set.
Proof.
Hint: if it were, it would be an ordinal and hence a member of itself.
Definition.
Addition of ordinals is defined by
Note the notation which is the same as . For ordinals and well-behaved functions this is often written .
Proposition.
For all ordinals we have .
Proof.
Induction on .
Proposition.
For all ordinals with we have .
Proof.
Induction on .
Proposition.
If then .
Exercise.
It is not true that if then for all .
Proposition.
For all , if is a limit ordinal then so is .
Proof.
If then for some so .
Proposition.
If then or for some .
Proof.
Let be least such that . Then is not a limit since it it were then so for some . If then , and if then .
Proposition.
For all we have .
Proof.
Fix and argue by induction on .
Exercise.
Verify the step in the last proof.
Exercise.
Show that for all ordinals ,
Exercise.
Show that it is not true in general that .
Exercise.
Show that if then there is such that . Is there alos such that ?
Exercise.
Using recursion on ordinals, define a modified subtraction operation such that is and otherwise. Prove your assertions.
Definition.
Multiplication of ordinals is defined by
We omit the multiplication symbol where it is clear to do so and have the convention that multiplication is more binding than addition, as for usual arithmetic.
Proposition.
If and then .
Proof.
Induction on .
Proposition.
If and is a limit then is also a limit.
Proposition.
For ordinals we have .
Proof.
Induction on .
Proposition.
For ordinals we have .
Proof.
Induction on .
Exercise.
It is not true in general that .
Exercise.
It is not true in general that .
Proposition.
For all with there are unique such that and .
Proof.
Choose least such that . Then is not zero nor a limit (why not?) so and . Now use a previous result to find .
Exercise.
Give examples of with such that for no is .
Definition.
Exponentiation of ordinals is defined by
Exercise.
Prove that for all ordinals.
Exercise.
Prove that for all ordinals.
A normal function is a class function such that for all and at limits.
Exercise.
Prove that for all normal functions and all there is such that .
Exercise.
Prove that for all normal functions there is a normal function such that the image of is precisely the set of fixed points of .