Proof

This is obviously true for [Maple Math] . For other values of [Maple Math] , we have

[Maple Math] ,

while

[Maple Math] ,

so that

[Maple Math]

and hence,

[Maple Math] .

Since [Maple Math] satisfies a Lipschitz Condition and using the bound on the second derivative, we find that

[Maple Math]

>

We can then use the previous Lemma with [Maple Math] , [Maple Math] and [Maple Math] :

[Maple Math] ,

which, since [Maple Math] , yields the required inequality:

[Maple Math]

if you take into account that [Maple Math] .

>