Exercises on discretely ordered rings

Define the canonical term for a natural number n by cterm ( 0 ) = 0 and for n 0 , cterm ( n +1 ) = ( cterm ( n ) + 1 ) .

Exercise 1.

Show that for n , m , k with n × m = k we have DOR ( cterm ( n ) × cterm ( m ) ) = cterm ( k ) . Be careful to state any induction hypothesis carefully.

An atomic L A formula is one of the form t = s or t < s , where t , s are terms. A negated atomic L A formula is one of the form ¬ σ where σ is atomic.

Exercise 2.

Given that DOR σ or DOR ¬ σ for every atomic L A sentence σ , show that DOR proves all true Δ 0 sentences.

We write u , v = w for the L A -formula ( u + v ) ( u + v + 1 ) + 2 u = 2 w . It is not true that DOR w u , v u , v = w , but DOR + DIV2 + SQRT w u , v u , v = w where DIV2 is the statement x y ( 2 y = x 2 y + 1 = x ) . and SQRT is the statement x y ( y 2 x x < ( y + 1 ) 2 ) . The injective property of the pairing function is, however, provable in DOR .

Exercise 3.

DOR x , y , u , v ( ( u + x = v u + y = v ) x = y ) and DOR u , v ¬ ( 2 u = 2 v + 1 ) . Prove these!

Exercise 4.

Prove in DOR that u , v , u , v , w u , v = w u , v = w u = u v = v .

Exercise 5.

Prove DOR + DIV2 + SQRT w u , v u , v = w .

(Hint: Given w M , a model of the theory above, first show that there is r M such that r ( r +1 )2 w < ( r +1 ) ( r +2 ) ; then find u such that r ( r +1 ) + 2 u = 2 w .)

A formula ϕ ( x 1 , , x m ) of L A is existential if it is of the form u 1 u m θ ( u 1 , u n , x 1 , , x m ) where θ ( u 1 , u n , x 1 , , x m ) is quantifier-free.

Exercise 6.

Prove that every existential formula ϕ ( x 1 , , x m ) of L A is provably equivalent in DOR to one of the form

v 1 v k t ( v 1 , , v k , x 1 , , x m ) = s ( v 1 , , v k , x 1 , , x m )

where t , s are terms in the language L A . (Use an induction on the different ways of building a quantifier-free formula θ from atomic and negated atomic ones.)